CEAC Responsibilities

a) coordinates the application of procedures and activities for evaluation and quality assurance, approved by the Senate, according to the following areas and criteria:

a.1. Institutional capacity: which results from internal organization, from the available infrastructure, defined by the following criteria:

• • institutional, administrative, and managerial structures;
  • material base and optimization of the use of the material base;
  • human resources and the institution's capacity to attract external human resources and from abroad, under the law.

a.2. Educational effectiveness, which consists of mobilizing resources in order to achieve the expected learning outcomes, materialized through: the content of study programs, learning outcomes, employability of graduates, and the financial activity of the organization;

a.3. Quality management, which is materialized through the following criteria:

• • strategies and procedures for quality assurance;
  • procedures regarding the initiation, monitoring, and periodic review of programs and activities carried out;
  • objective and transparent procedures for evaluating learning outcomes, including by students; - periodic evaluation procedures of the quality of the teaching staff;
  • accessibility of adequate learning resources;
  • systematically updated database regarding internal quality assurance;
  • transparency of public interest information, including those related to study programs and the certificates, diplomas, and qualifications offered;
  • functionality of the structures for ensuring the quality of education;
  • accuracy of the reports required by the current legislation.

b) prepares and publishes an annual internal evaluation report regarding the quality of education at USAMVBT;

c) formulates proposals for improving the quality of education;

d) collaborates with the Department for Quality Management (DMC) for the implementation, planning, organization, and control of the quality management system at the level of each organizational subdivision of USAMVBT;

e) develops activities for establishing qualitative and quantitative benchmarks (benchmarking) by comparing with other universities in the country and abroad for the evaluation and monitoring of quality;

f) manages the evaluation process of teaching staff and applies regulations regarding data collection and statistical interpretation of these (questionnaires, statistical forms, observation sheets, evaluation scales, etc.);

g) implements preventive actions regarding intellectual fraud by organizing planned training based on specific references;

h) in the case of proven intellectual fraud will manage the process of re-evaluating the teaching staff in question, in accordance with the current regulations;

i) archives the documents resulting from the evaluation process of the teaching staff and makes them available to entitled persons according to the current regulations;

j) cooperates with DMC in developing the strategic plan and the annual operational plan regarding quality assurance and in preparing periodic evaluation reports of the quality of education at the institutional level.